Scholar: After Fisher, Schools Should Reassess Diversity.

No. 14-981. In the Supreme Court of the United States. Abigail Noel Fisher, Petitioner v. The University of Texas at Austin, et al., Respondents. On June 23, 2016, by a 4-3 vote, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals holding the University's undergraduate admissions program to be constitutional.

On October 10, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments for Fisher v. University of Texas. The petitioner, Abigail Fisher, a white student, challenged the university's consideration of race in the undergraduate admissions process. Fisher, who was denied admission to UT Austin in Fall 2008, argued that UT's use of race in admissions decisions violated her right to equal protection under the.

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin: Promoting Full.

Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement - June 23, 2016 in Fisher v. University of Texas John G. Roberts, Jr.: Justice Kennedy has our opinion this morning in case 14-981, Fisher versus the University of Texas. Anthony M. Kennedy: The University of Texas at Austin relies upon a complex system of admissions. That system has undergone significant evolution over the past two decades. Under.Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - Ruling June 23, 2016; Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - Amicus Brief October 30, 2015; Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - Supreme Court Decision June 24, 2013; Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin - ACLU Amicus Brief August 10, 2012.Many expected Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (Fisher I), 133 S. Ct. 2411 (2013)-an appeal from the Court ofAppeals for the Fifth Circuit upholding the University of Texas at Austin's race-conscious admissions program-to sound the death knell for race-based affirmative action in higher education. Instead, in remanding the case back to.


The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Fisher v.University of Texas at Austin, docket number 14-981.The case concerns the consideration of race as a factor in the undergraduate admissions.Fisher v. Univ. of Tex. at Austin, 645 F. Supp. 2d 587 (W.D. Tex. 2009) (No. -26308), ECF No. 96 (hereinafter Ishop Aff.). 3. Office of Admissions, Univ. of Tex. at Austin, Implementation and Results of the Texas Automatic Admissions Law (HB 588) at the University of Texas at Austin: Demographic.

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 133 S. Ct. 2411 (2013). In July 2014, for the second time, the Fifth Circuit upheld the UT Austin admissions plan. Fisher v. Univ. of Tex. at Austin, 758 F.3d 633 (5th Cir. 2014). Fisher petitioned to have the Supreme Court review the case (again) and that request was granted on June 29, 2015. For many years, the AAUP has taken a leadership role in.

Read More

Affirmative action has survived another court challenge, after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 4-3 on Thursday that the University of Texas-Austin’s consideration of race in admissions was legal. The case, Fisher v. University of Texas-Austin, stems from 2008, when Abigail Fisher was rejected by the university. She claimed it was because she was.

Read More

On October 30, 2015, the American Educational Research Association filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court’s reconsideration of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin.The association was joined by nine other scientific societies in urging the court to consider an overwhelming body of scientific evidence relevant to the case.

Read More

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The University of Texas at Austin argued before the United States Supreme Court today that all students — and the nation as a whole — benefit when colleges and universities are able to assemble truly diverse student bodies. UT Austin defended its admissions process in the case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin.

Read More

The landmark ruling in the Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin case enabled UT to continue recruiting a diverse student body, reflective of a wide range of backgrounds and experiences. President Fenves was instrumental in the founding of UT’s Dell Medical School — the first medical school in nearly 50 years to be built from the ground up at a top-tier research university — which.

Read More

Fisher v. UT Austin UT Austin On June 23, 2016, by a 4-3 vote, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals holding the University's undergraduate admissions program to be constitutional.

Read More

Fisher v. University of Texas. United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 631 F.3d 213 (2011) Facts. Texas enacted a law, called the Top Ten Percent Law, which guaranteed admission to the University of Texas (UT) (defendant) for Texas residents that were in the top 10 percent of their high school classes. The law was enacted primarily to increase enrollment of underrepresented.

Read More

Fisher v. U. Texas at Austin. Statement from U-M President Mark Schlissel. June 23, 2016. Decades of research have conclusively demonstrated the benefits of diversity in higher education. Today’s ruling is a victory for all who value a robust exchange of perspectives and support our ability to prepare students to succeed in an increasingly multicultural society. Universities cannot be.

Read More

Abstract. In deciding Fisher v.University of Texas at Austin, the U.S. Supreme Court in its 7-1 majority opinion issued a cautious and limited ruling, but one that strengthens the role of evidence-based judicial review and process in applying strict scrutiny.As an initial and important matter, Fisher does not disturb the Court's earlier holdings in Regents of the University of California v.

Read More

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument on (Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin), docket number 11-345, a case on affirmative action policies in higher education. Justice Kagan did not take.

Read More